History in the making
With a fascinating week two at Wimbledon in store, Barry Cowan's back to answer your questions.
Last Updated: 27/06/10 2:52pm
Throughout Wimbledon Sky Sports tennis expert Barry Cowan will be on hand to answer your questions on all aspects of the Championship - from on-court duels to off-grass issues.
Perhaps you have a query about a particular player or coach, want to share a particular Wimbledon memory or simply want to get Barry's take on a wide matter in the men's or women's game.
Whatever your question Barry, a former British tennis player who memorably went shot-for-shot with 'Pistol' Pete Sampras at Wimbledon 2001, will do his best to answer it.
So don't delay; with the Championships in full swing you can send your question in right now for Barry's consideration.
Click here to email your question, send your question to email@example.com, with 'Barry Cowan' in the subject field, or fill out the feedback form below...
Hi Barry, what a simply amazing match that was between Isner and Mahut. I was glued throughout and don't know where the last week has gone! Now it's finally over I can't believe that people are calling for a fifth-set tie-break to be introduced! If we had one then none of that drama would never have happened. Surely records are there to be broken otherwise what is the point? I'd be interested to find out where you stand on this one mate. Graham, Croydon
BARRY REPLIES: Graham, if people are calling for a fifth-set tie-break then that's their loss quite frankly. It would disappoint me hugely if, having seen history rewritten and witnessed an epic contest that is unlikely to ever happen again, that people only focus on the negative side of things. Let's not go health and safety mad otherwise what's next? Are you going to put a time limit on matches - say two hours, or three hours? No, let's recognise that this match was an exception and an incredibly gripping one at that; let's celebrate the positive.
I'm a fan of having a long fifth set in the Grand Slams; tour events are different because players more often than not have to play the next day. Part of doing well in a Grand Slam is finding a way to negotiate your early-round matches with the minimum of fuss; if you don't you simply make life harder for yourself and pay for it later on.
Not only did this match showcase the amazing fitness of our professionals but the fact that it involved two less familiar names in was John Isner and Nicolas Mahut will hopefully have grabbed the attention of plenty of people who don't normally watch tennis. Theirs is an incredible achievement - players and ex-players alike are struggling to comprehend what they've achieved, both physically and mentally. Spare a particular thought for Mahut because not only did he lose but he was the one who had to serve to stay in the match throughout - and that must have been exhausting.
OVER THE TOP
Morning, a bit of a technical question for you if that's ok? I've seen plenty of players attempt to play a lob shot during this year's Wimbledon but very few succeed. I don't know if this is normal or not or if there are any stats that show why this is but I wondered if it is unusual and whether it's something you've noticed? I wondered if some of the players have not adapted to playing outdoors - not that it's very windy. Any who, can you give me your top three tips for playing a lob as I'd like to do much better than the pros! Sam
BARRY REPLIES: Sam, it's not something I've noticed to be honest although it is true that it can be more difficult to control the ball the hotter it gets because it flies through the air more quickly. A lob is generally a feel shot, an instinctive shot rather than a driven forehand from the back of the court laden with top-spin so there is instantly more margin for error.
The best piece of advice I can give you when playing a lob shot is to watch the ball. It's almost like trying to hole a three-foot putt in golf. So many players strike the ball towards the hole and then lift their head to see if it's gone in. It's the same in tennis - I can't overestimate the importance of keeping your head down because that will help you finish the shot with a full and flowing follow-through.
Hi Barry, wondered if you could tell me why the Queen doesn't visit Wimbledon more often? Melanie, CheamBARRY REPLIES: It was great to see the Queen at Wimbledon - it's been far too long since her last visit - and she brought a genuine sense of occasion to Centre Court. Although she is invited every year, the fact she can't make each and every Championships makes it all the more special when she does. I'm told she was planning to come last year for the final if Andy Murray made it through. Imagine that - Andy winning and receiving the trophy from the Queen! Could it get much better?
Hi Barry, who decides who gets to play on Centre Court? Serena Williams was on court two on Thursday - unbelievable?! They should be forced to explain themselves because she's won the title three times and deserves to be treated much better. Juliet, Leamington
BARRY REPLIES: There are many different factors to consider when scheduling the Order of Play these days, Juliet, not least the demands of foreign TV companies and an assessment of how many times each player has appeared on Centre or No 1 court.
The basic rule, though, is that there are always two men's matches and one women's match on those two courts per day which instantly cuts down the number of options available. The organisers won't allow Serena Williams to play every match on centre because that simply isn't fair on the other top-seeded players and because they want to stage a competitive match for the paying spectators.
Let's use Thursday's play as an example. Serena smashed Anna Chakvetadze 6-0, 6-1 in 48 minutes on court No 2 in a match that wasn't much of a contest while third seed Caroline Wozniacki played on Centre Court and Maria Sharapova, a former champion, took to No 1. To me that was very sensible planning.
As a player you've got to take the rough with the smooth - something Jelena Jankovic failed to do back in 2008 when she played on Court No 18 despite being seeded second. She famously threw a paddy saying she practically needed a helicopter to get to her match, which didn't reflect well on her. Overall, I think the organisers do a good job given the limitations they have to work with.
RAFA IN CREDIT
Rafa is really worrying me, Barry, - I've got a lot of money riding on him! He looked really out of sorts before he had to pick up his game against Haase. He didn't seem to be putting as much spin on the ball as he normally does either. I hope he hasn't got wrist problems like Del Potro?! Jonno
BARRY REPLIES: Jonno, I thought it was a fantastic match and that Rafa played some great tennis. We have to remember that just because he is No 2 Rafa doesn't have a divine right to win. At times Haase closed his eyes and was hitting winners - there was nothing Rafa could do about it. Sometimes I feel we don't give enough credit to a player who takes a set of a top player; instead of suggesting Rafa wasn't playing well we should give plenty of credit to Robin who really stepped up his game on Centre. The same goes for Ilija Bozoljac, who played a career match against Roger Federer in the second round.
But the beauty of a Grand Slam is that you have to win three sets which demands incredible consistency - something Rafa has in spades.
He looked great physically and mentally to me - he brings an incredible amount of energy to the court and the crowd feed off that. If he tried to put as much spin on the ball on grass as he does on a clay court then he will get eaten alive. Instead, he's learnt to play further up the court and flatten his shots; he's taking the ball earlier, which helps him to use his opponent's pace and strike the ball over the net at a lower angle.