Formula 1 might be the world's most technological sport but that doesn't make predicting the new season any easier. F1 reporter Mike Wise offers some early observations following testing in Jerez...
Friday 17 February 2012 12:16, UK
F1 might be the world's most technological sport but that doesn't make predicting the new season any easier.
If you think that Formula 1, with its wind tunnels and simulators, with its reliance on fluid dynamics and mass flow rates, is the most technically advanced of all sports then you'd be right. Yet even in this world, it's reassuring to know that the best thing about any sport - its uncertainty - thrives. That much was immediately apparent as I prowled the Jerez paddock during last week's opening pre-season test. The first race is little over a month away and yet predicting how the season might unfold is anyone's guess. And by anyone, I really do mean anyone. You or I could have just as good a stab at it as Adrian Newey. A Professorship of Vehicle Engineering might stand Dr Mark Gillan in good stead in his role as Williams' Chief Operations Engineer, but it doesn't grant him access to a crystal ball. Yes, some people are rather more informed in drawing their conclusions and yet the secretive, almost neurotic, level of competition that exists in F1 ensures that no-one ever truly knows precisely what is going on. In displays that seem just as much showbiz as flow vis, screening panels are hastily erected around cars as they re-enter their garages, while mechanics are dispatched to record rival machines as they make practice starts - perhaps the engine note might reveal something they have that we don't? I even found myself wondering whether social media is being drawn into the game of bluff: Caterham's Mike Gascoyne tweeted after the test that they had run high fuel levels throughout the week and yet their times, usually in the 1:22-1:23s bracket, tended to be quicker than those of Williams. Does this mean that Tony Fernandes' team are now in the midfield? Maybe, maybe not. Sometimes it seems as though the more one stares at the puddle and furrows one's brow, the murkier it gets. The drivers themselves played a straight bat, to a man saying it's far too early to make predictions. So perhaps body language might reveal something? Lewis Hamilton's eyes were aglow after his first run in the MP4-27 while Fernando Alonso seemed more muted. Yet even that approach fell flat when faced with the inscrutable visage of Kimi Raikkonen - a man who might well wear his heart on his sleeve, but not within a million miles of an assembled media scrum. We were also told that the two upcoming tests in Barcelona might reveal a little more, yet there are exceptions to that rule as well: remember McLaren last year? And what of Mercedes this? Has their gamble to skip Jerez and concentrate on developing the W03 paid off? Time will tell. A fairly static technical rulebook tells its own story when trying to make predictions - one thing that everyone seems to agree on is that the order will not be shaken up massively. And yet lines are so fine in F1 that the order need not be shuffled by teams either making a major breakthrough or dropping a massive one. The guessing game will continue right up until Melbourne - right up until qualifying probably. Never mind testing, Sebastian Vettel made an art of sand-bagging during a race weekend last year. The World Champion seemed happy enough in Spain last week; no change there then.