Sunday 6 January 2008 16:59, UK
Nasser Hussain says England's selectors must be consistent in order for the team to fulfil its potential.
The one real surprise from the England squads to tour New Zealand next month is the Matt Prior omission; I think everyone presumed that he would be given another chance. But the selectors obviously felt that enough's enough - and to be fair he's dropped enough chances. Matt can't feel too hard done by because his main job as wicketkeeper is to catch the ball! He dropped eight chances off Ryan Sidebottom in Sri Lanka and he seems to have struggled keeping to the left-armer which is surprising because he's kept to Jason Lewry at Sussex. If you keep dropping the ball as a wicketkeeper unfortunately the selectors - and also the bowlers - will eventually want to see a change made. So Tim Ambrose is given his chance as David Graveney and co have again opted for a wicket-keeper-batsman. With the make-up of this England side, if you look at what they're trying to build, the bowlers don't particularly bat that well. And then next summer when hopefully Andrew Flintoff comes back into the team, he will bat at six - and he hasn't really progressed as a batsman as well as the selectors would have liked. And if you have a keeper at seven, followed by Sidebottom at eight, [Matthew] Hoggard, [Steve] Harmison and [Monty] Panesar - that's a very long tail. There are many people, including myself, who believe that a keeper's primary job is to keep wicket. My Sky Sports colleagues Michael Holding and Bob Willis are also of that view. But in the make up of the present England side they will need their wicketkeeper to get runs. So Tim Ambrose probably nipped in ahead of someone like James Foster, who from what I've seen in the last couple of years has been the best gloveman in the country. Moores went with his boy in Prior and unfortunately for both of them it didn't pay off. I am disappointed for Matt Prior as he burst on the scene against the West Indies, keeping well and scoring runs. And he is the type of cricketer that you want in your side so hopefully he will work out these problems with the gloves and can come again. I think the selectors have just gone for Ambrose on his record - he scored a weight of runs last season for Warwickshire and he is a wicket-keeper-batsman. There are a lot of good wicketkeepers out there - Foster, Chris Read, Geraint Jones, Ambrose, Prior, Phil Mustard - but one of them has to stand out from the pack and be better than good. They need to take their opportunity and the selectors need to show faith in them so that England can finally move on from Alec Stewart. We've had a lot of men behind the stumps since Alec and we can't keep going round in circles. The selectors need to earmark one player and stick by him - I know that player has to perform, but my point is that right at this moment they still are not sure who is their best wicketkeeper. Listening to David Graveney when he announced the squads he still isn't 100 per cent certain who was better out of Ambrose and Mustard. It was a little bit of a 'wait and see' situation which is not ideal.